Sartre's Philosophy of World

 Jean-Paul Sartre’s philosophy presents a stark and unsettling view of existence, emphasizing meaninglessness, absurdity, and contingency. He believed that nothing has an ultimate reason for being—things simply exist without deeper justification. His ideas, particularly explored in his novel Nausea, highlight the discomfort of realizing that existence lacks inherent meaning.

Sartre’s concept of contingency suggests that everything exists without a necessary reason. Unlike mathematical objects like a circle, which follow logical rules, real-world objects simply are. His character Roquentin, in Nausea, experiences this realization when observing an oak tree: it exists without purpose, just as everything else in the world does. This insight extends to human life—why were we born in a particular time or place? Why do we exist at all? No ultimate answer is possible. This realization can be unsettling, leading to the conclusion that life itself is a matter of chance.

Building on this, Sartre introduces the idea of surplus—the notion that everything is excessive and unnecessary. If nothing has a reason to exist, then existence itself is redundant. Roquentin recognizes that he, too, is just "there," like a tree or a rock, without any inherent necessity. This concept applies universally—whether one observes a crowded city, a vast desert, or a bustling marketplace, everything and everyone simply exists, without any fundamental justification. This can lead to an overwhelming awareness of life’s randomness, making people feel insignificant or unnecessary in the grand scheme of things.

The realization of contingency and surplus leads to a profound sense of nausea, a term Sartre uses to describe the existential horror of meaninglessness. Nausea is not just physical discomfort but a deep, existential panic. Roquentin experiences this when he feels overwhelmed by the raw existence of things around him. Objects appear grotesque and excessive, as if their presence is too much to bear. This feeling can arise in everyday life—one might suddenly become aware of the strangeness of their surroundings, questioning why things are the way they are. Some people experience nausea when they reflect on their repetitive routines, asking, “Why do I wake up every day and do the same things? What is the point of it all?” This confrontation with meaninglessness can be deeply disturbing.

Ultimately, Sartre’s philosophy leads to the concept of absurdity—the realization that existence is fundamentally without meaning, yet we continue to seek purpose. The world exists without having asked to, and we are born without choosing to be. While people try to create meaning through religion, philosophy, or personal goals, Sartre argues that all such efforts are ultimately futile. This idea parallels the myth of Sisyphus, who endlessly rolls a boulder uphill only to see it roll down again. Life, according to Sartre, mirrors this struggle—we keep living, striving, and hoping, yet there is no final destination or ultimate answer.

Despite the bleakness of this perspective, Sartre does not advocate despair. Instead, he argues that recognizing absurdity grants us freedom. Since life has no predetermined meaning, we have the responsibility to create our own. This means embracing personal freedom, making choices that define us, and living authentically rather than conforming to societal expectations. Rather than being trapped by meaninglessness, we can shape our own existence. In this way, Sartre’s philosophy challenges us to confront absurdity and take ownership of our lives, forging our own paths in a world without inherent purpose.

Link for Video: https://youtu.be/rdXeXb6iR4A

Link for PPT: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1V0A4neySGBQ2PO0OePOMLH_mcJeHTDGE/view?usp=sharing